Akaal Movie Controversy: Why Gippy Grewal Vows to Never Make a Sikh-Centric Film Again

Naresh Sharma 

Punjabi filmmaker and actor Gippy Grewal had high hopes for his ambitious project Akaal. Unfortunately, the film got entangled in a storm of controversy soon after its release. Several Sikh organizations voiced strong objections, leading to protests and demands to halt screenings at multiple cinema halls. The backlash was so severe that Gippy ultimately vowed never to make a film based on Sikh themes again.

The film had a production budget reportedly between ₹20 to ₹22 crores. However, it has only managed to collect around ₹8 to ₹9 crores. This indicates a significant loss.

What Went Wrong?

From the start, Akaal was under scrutiny. Critics argue that Gippy should have approached the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) for guidance and clearance. He released a film closely resembling Sikh history without consulting them. While Gippy claims the film is purely fictional, viewers have noticed that the trailer and characters resemble Sikh figures. This has led to misunderstandings and objections.

Akaal Movie : A Victim of Industry Politics?

Insiders suggest that Akaal has become a victim of internal politics within Punjabi cinema. Popular Punjabi singers and actors have divided themselves, and they are openly airing their conflicts on social media. Some believe jealousy and rivalry within the industry played a part in escalating the backlash.

Dharma Productions and Humble Motion Pictures collaborated on this project to elevate Punjabi cinema. However, it seems to have fueled even more skepticism. This is due to the sensitivity of the subject matter.

Controversial Portrayals and Missed Details

Another criticism revolves around character representation. All lead actors — Gippy Grewal, Gurpreet Ghuggi, and Nimrat Khaira — belong to the Sikh community. However, detractors argue that they do not use ‘Singh’ or ‘Kaur’ in their official names. This omission is seen as disrespectful by traditionalists.

The portrayal of the robbers in the film has sparked debate. They are stylish and powerful. They are dressed more like Mughal warriors than historical Sikh figures. Viewers drew comparisons with Alauddin Khilji’s army from Ranveer Singh’s Padmaavat.

Should Gippy Have Transformed for the Role?

Many feel that Gippy could have adapted his appearance more authentically for the character of Sardar Akaal Singh. This sentiment persists even if it was fictional. Critics pointed to Bollywood examples. Bobby Deol grew a real beard in Animal. Aamir Khan gained and lost weight for Dangal. Randeep Hooda underwent physical transformation in Sarabjit. These are instances where actors went the extra mile to bring realism.

Gippy’s argument states that Akaal is based on imagination. It includes stylized elements like Hollywood-style weapons and tattoos. This has not convinced the traditional audience.

Divided Audience, Unfulfilled Expectations

While protests continued, there is still a section of the audience that appreciates the film’s vision and effort. Despite the controversy, Akaal is expected to cross ₹10 crore at the box office. However, this falls well short of its potential.

In his recent statements, Gippy Grewal made it clear. He stated this may be his last film related to Sikh history. It may also be his last film related to Sikh themes. “I didn’t make this movie to hurt anyone,” he said. “My intention was to create something meaningful for Punjabi cinema.”

Final Thoughts

The Akaal controversy reflects a larger challenge in Indian cinema: balancing creative freedom with cultural and religious sensitivities. While filmmakers must have space to tell powerful stories, consultation with community leaders can often prevent misunderstandings. Gippy Grewal’s experience may serve as a cautionary tale for future storytellers in regional cinema.